SupplementsResearch PaperOpen Access

Caffeine Plus Taurine Beats Either Alone for Anaerobic Power and Reaction Speed

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 12 trials finds CAF+TAU co-supplementation outperforms each compound alone for anaerobic capacity and reaction time.

Friday, June 26, 2026 9 views
Published in J Int Soc Sports Nutr
Two open capsules — one white (caffeine) and one yellow (taurine) — spilling powder onto a dark lab bench beside a stopwatch and a small blood lactate meter

Summary

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis synthesized 12 randomized controlled trials examining caffeine (CAF), taurine (TAU), and their combination (CAF+TAU) on physical performance, cognition, and physiological markers. The combined supplement showed a credible positive effect on anaerobic capacity (Hedge's g = 0.46) and reaction time (g = 0.75) versus either compound alone. Caffeine alone most reduced perceived exertion, while taurine showed a trend toward lowering blood lactate. Heart rate was unaffected across all conditions. SUCRA rankings consistently favored CAF+TAU across most outcomes, suggesting the combination delivers a more balanced ergogenic profile than either ingredient in isolation, though effects on aerobic performance were variable and context-dependent.

Detailed Summary

Caffeine and taurine are the two most prevalent bioactive compounds in commercial energy drinks and among the most studied ergogenic aids in sports nutrition. Despite their widespread co-formulation, rigorous evidence comparing their individual versus combined effects has been lacking. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, represents the first attempt to directly quantify synergistic or antagonistic interactions between CAF and TAU across physical performance, cognitive function, and key physiological markers using network meta-analytic methods.

Researchers searched five major databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, SciELO, SportsDiscus-EBSCO, and Web of Science) through July 2025. Twelve studies met strict inclusion criteria: human subjects, peer-reviewed full-text, at least one CAF+TAU condition, single-blind randomized controlled design minimum, and outcomes focused on exercise performance and physiological responses. Studies co-administering additional supplements (amino acids, glucose, carbohydrates) alongside CAF and TAU were excluded to isolate the specific compound effects. The final sample comprised 8 studies on physical capacity, 7 on blood lactate, and 6 each on cognitive function, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Effect sizes were computed as Hedge's g (bias-corrected for small samples) and synthesized via Bayesian arm-based multilevel network meta-analysis, with SUCRA rankings used to estimate relative treatment probability.

For anaerobic capacity, CAF+TAU demonstrated a credible positive effect over either compound alone (g = 0.46, 95% CrI [0.19, 0.71]), with the credible interval fully excluding zero — one of the stronger findings in the analysis. Reaction time showed an even larger benefit for the combination (g = 0.75, 95% CrI [0.29, 1.18]), suggesting meaningful cognitive-motor advantages. Caffeine alone produced the greatest reduction in RPE (g = -0.64, 95% CrI [-1.20, -0.10]), consistent with its known adenosine-receptor antagonism reducing perceived fatigue. Taurine showed a non-credible but directionally interesting tendency to reduce blood lactate (g = -0.30, 95% CrI [-1.01, 0.42]), while caffeine trended toward a lactate increase (g = 0.24, 95% CrI [-0.48, 0.96]). No credible differences in heart rate were observed across any condition.

SUCRA rankings consistently placed CAF+TAU at or near the top across most outcome domains, reinforcing the multi-pathway advantage of combining central nervous system stimulation (caffeine's primary mechanism) with taurine's neuromodulatory, antioxidant, and calcium-signaling roles. Effects on aerobic endurance and broader physiological indices were variable and context-dependent, suggesting that individual factors — training status, exercise modality, and dosing timing — may moderate outcomes substantially. The authors propose that the combination is particularly suited to high-intensity, reaction-based sports tasks.

Several caveats are important for interpretation. Only 12 studies were included, limiting statistical power for subgroup analyses. Most were crossover designs with small samples, and heterogeneity in dosing (CAF ranges roughly 3–6 mg/kg; TAU 1–3 g) complicates dose-response conclusions. The Bayesian framework handles sparse networks well but introduces prior-sensitivity considerations. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis provides the clearest evidence to date that CAF+TAU co-supplementation is superior to either alone for short-duration, high-intensity and cognitively demanding tasks, offering practical guidance for athletes, clinicians, and energy product formulators alike.

Key Findings

  • CAF+TAU combination improved anaerobic capacity with a credible effect size of g = 0.46 (95% CrI [0.19, 0.71]) versus either compound alone, with CrI fully excluding zero
  • Reaction time was improved most by CAF+TAU (g = 0.75, 95% CrI [0.29, 1.18]), the largest credible benefit observed in the entire analysis
  • Caffeine alone produced the greatest reduction in rating of perceived exertion (g = -0.64, 95% CrI [-1.20, -0.10]), consistent with its adenosine-antagonism mechanism
  • Taurine alone showed a directional (non-credible) trend toward reducing blood lactate (g = -0.30, 95% CrI [-1.01, 0.42]), while caffeine alone trended toward increasing it (g = 0.24)
  • Heart rate was not credibly different across CAF, TAU, or CAF+TAU versus placebo in any of the 6 included HR studies
  • SUCRA rankings placed CAF+TAU at the top across most outcome domains in the network, indicating it is the most consistently favorable treatment
  • Effects on aerobic performance were variable and context-dependent across the 8 physical capacity studies, with no single agent dominating endurance outcomes

Methodology

This was a Bayesian arm-based multilevel network meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials (11 crossover, 1 parallel design) identified through systematic search of 5 databases. Effect sizes were calculated as Hedge's g with SD pooled per Cochrane Handbook guidance for each design type. SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking) was applied to rank relative treatment probabilities across CAF, TAU, CAF+TAU, and placebo. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's RoB2 tool and methodological quality with the QualSyst instrument.

Study Limitations

The analysis included only 12 studies with small sample sizes, limiting power for dose-response and subgroup analyses; heterogeneity in CAF and TAU doses across studies makes it difficult to identify optimal protocols. Most studies were crossover designs, which, while statistically efficient, introduce potential carryover effects if washout periods were inadequate. The authors declared no funding conflicts, but publication bias cannot be fully excluded given the relatively sparse literature, and Bayesian results are sensitive to prior specification in thin networks.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: