Brain HealthResearch PaperOpen Access

CSF TMEM106B Levels Track Frontotemporal Dementia Severity and Brain Atrophy

A new biomarker study shows CSF TMEM106B protein drops with worsening FTD and predicts brain shrinkage and faster decline.

Sunday, June 28, 2026 1 view
Published in JAMA Neurol
A lab technician in blue gloves handling a labeled CSF sample vial next to a clinical centrifuge, with a brain MRI scan visible on a monitor in the background

Summary

Researchers measured TMEM106B protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 654 people across two independent cohorts — some with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), some with Alzheimer disease, and healthy controls. Lower CSF TMEM106B levels were consistently linked to more severe disease, smaller frontotemporal brain volumes, and faster clinical progression over two years. Importantly, TMEM106B levels were also shaped by a person's genetic variant at the TMEM106B rs1990622 site: those carrying the protective G/G genotype had lower CSF levels than A/A carriers. CSF TMEM106B did not distinguish FTD subtypes from each other or from Alzheimer disease, but its association with severity was independent of neurofilament light chain, a well-established neurodegeneration marker.

Detailed Summary

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a leading cause of early-onset dementia, yet reliable fluid biomarkers that track disease severity across its heterogeneous subtypes remain scarce. TMEM106B — a lysosomal protein encoded by a gene on chromosome 7 — has emerged as a major genetic susceptibility factor for FTLD, and TMEM106B protein aggregates have been identified across aging brains and multiple neurodegenerative conditions. This study is the first large-scale investigation of CSF TMEM106B as a quantifiable biomarker in clinical FTLD populations.

The investigators enrolled participants through two independent multicenter cohorts. The discovery cohort (n = 271; 51% women; median age 59 years) comprised individuals with neuropathology-confirmed sporadic FTLD, presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72, GRN, or MAPT genes, and healthy controls. The validation cohort (n = 383; 48% women; median age 64 years) included clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. CSF TMEM106B was quantified using aptamer-based proteomics (SomaScan v3.0 for discovery, v4.1 for validation). Brain MRI volumes and longitudinal clinical severity scores over two years were integrated with the CSF measurements.

Lower CSF TMEM106B was significantly associated with greater clinical disease severity across both cohorts (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003). Crucially, this association was independent of neurofilament light chain (NfL), a well-validated neurodegeneration marker, suggesting TMEM106B captures a distinct biological dimension of disease burden. Lower CSF TMEM106B was also strongly linked to smaller frontotemporal brain volumes on MRI (β = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24–0.61; P < .001), and participants with lower levels at baseline showed faster clinical progression over the following two years (β = −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001).

A striking genetic finding emerged: the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype — previously associated with FTLD risk — directly influenced CSF TMEM106B levels. Individuals carrying the protective G/G genotype had significantly lower CSF TMEM106B compared to those with the risk A/A genotype, regardless of their underlying neuropathological diagnosis or disease-causing mutation. This genotype effect was observed across both familial (C9orf72, GRN, MAPT) and sporadic FTLD groups, pointing to a genetically regulated mechanism that modulates protein levels in the CNS compartment.

Notably, CSF TMEM106B did not discriminate between FTLD subtypes (e.g., behavioral variant FTD versus primary progressive aphasia) nor between FTLD and Alzheimer disease, limiting its diagnostic specificity. The authors interpret this as consistent with TMEM106B being a general marker of lysosomal or neuronal stress that spans neurodegenerative proteinopathies rather than a disease-specific indicator. This finding also opens intriguing questions about whether interventions targeting lysosomal function could modulate TMEM106B levels. The study's cross-sectional design for most analyses and the use of different SomaScan assay versions across cohorts are important methodological caveats that warrant cautious interpretation of the quantitative comparisons.

Key Findings

  • Lower CSF TMEM106B associated with greater disease severity across both cohorts (β = −0.15; 95% CI −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003)
  • Lower CSF TMEM106B linked to smaller frontotemporal brain volumes on MRI (β = 0.42; 95% CI 0.24–0.61; P < .001)
  • Low baseline CSF TMEM106B predicted faster 2-year clinical progression (β = −2.21; 95% CI −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001)
  • TMEM106B rs1990622 protective G/G genotype carriers had lower CSF TMEM106B than risk A/A carriers, regardless of diagnosis
  • Association of CSF TMEM106B with disease severity was independent of neurofilament light chain (NfL)
  • CSF TMEM106B did not differentiate FTLD subtypes from each other or from Alzheimer disease
  • Findings replicated across discovery (n = 271) and independent validation (n = 383) cohorts spanning familial and sporadic FTD

Methodology

This was a cross-sectional study with 2-year longitudinal follow-up, conducted across two independent multicenter cohorts (total n = 654) recruited from UCSF and the ALLFTD consortium between April 2009 and July 2023. CSF TMEM106B was quantified via aptamer-based proteomics (SomaScan v3.0 discovery; v4.1 validation), and outcomes included CDR Sum of Boxes clinical severity scores, MRI-derived frontotemporal brain volumes, and rate of clinical progression. Statistical analyses used parametric tests including linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and relevant covariates, with genotype subgroup analyses stratified by TMEM106B rs1990622 status.

Study Limitations

The primary analyses were cross-sectional, limiting causal inference about how TMEM106B changes over time precede or follow clinical decline. The two cohorts used different versions of the SomaScan assay (v3.0 vs v4.1), potentially introducing quantitative differences that complicate direct comparison of absolute TMEM106B levels. Several authors disclosed consulting fees or research grants from pharmaceutical companies (including Alector, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Novartis) with interests in FTD therapeutics, representing potential conflicts of interest.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: