Cancer ResearchResearch PaperOpen Access

Digital Tool Doubles Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Detection in Major Trial

Patient-facing screening tool integrated with electronic health records significantly improved identification of eligible patients.

Sunday, March 29, 2026 0 views
Published in JAMA oncology
Scientific visualization: Digital Tool Doubles Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Detection in Major Trial

Summary

A large randomized trial found that adding a patient-facing digital tool to electronic health records more than doubled the identification of people eligible for lung cancer screening. The MyLungHealth tool collected detailed smoking histories and provided personalized education through patient portals. Among 31,303 participants across two health systems, the intervention increased new eligibility identification from 2.3% to 4.7% and boosted screening orders from 19.2% to 20.5%. While lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scans can catch cancer early and save lives, it remains underused partly due to incomplete smoking records and limited clinic time for discussions.

Detailed Summary

Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scans can detect cancer early and save lives, but remains significantly underused in the United States. A major barrier is incomplete smoking history documentation in medical records and limited time for patient-doctor discussions about screening benefits and risks.

Researchers conducted a large randomized trial across University of Utah Health and NYU Langone Health systems, studying 31,303 adults aged 50-79 with smoking histories. They tested whether adding a patient-facing digital tool called MyLungHealth to existing clinician decision support would improve screening rates compared to clinician tools alone.

The MyLungHealth tool worked through patient portals in English and Spanish, collecting detailed smoking histories and providing personalized education about screening risks and benefits. The study had two parts: identifying patients with uncertain eligibility (26,729 participants) and encouraging screening among clearly eligible patients (4,574 participants).

Results were significant: the patient-facing tool more than doubled new eligibility identification from 2.3% to 4.7%. Among clearly eligible patients, screening orders increased from 19.2% to 20.5%. While these relative improvements were substantial, absolute increases remained modest, suggesting room for more intensive interventions.

For health-conscious individuals, this research highlights the importance of accurate smoking history documentation and proactive screening discussions. Early lung cancer detection dramatically improves survival rates, making these screening improvements potentially life-saving for thousands of patients. The digital approach also demonstrates how technology can enhance preventive care without overwhelming healthcare providers, potentially serving as a model for other cancer screening programs.

Key Findings

  • Patient-facing digital tool doubled lung cancer screening eligibility identification rates
  • Screening orders increased by 1.3 percentage points among eligible patients
  • Tool worked in both English and Spanish through patient portals
  • Intervention improved smoking history documentation in medical records
  • Results suggest need for more intensive interventions to maximize screening uptake

Methodology

Pragmatic randomized trial with 31,303 participants across two major health systems over 12 months. Control group received clinician decision support tools; intervention group also received patient-facing MyLungHealth portal tool. Used intention-to-treat analysis with mixed-effects logistic regression.

Study Limitations

Absolute improvements were modest despite significant relative gains. Study limited to two health systems with established patient portal usage. Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness not evaluated in this 12-month study.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.