First-Time Seizures Signal Hidden Cancer Risk Far Beyond the Brain
A Danish cohort of 49,894 adults shows first-time seizures carry a 76-fold elevated risk of neurological cancer and double the risk of non-neurological cancers within one year.
Summary
A nationwide Danish study of nearly 50,000 adults found that experiencing a first-time seizure dramatically raises the short-term risk of being diagnosed with cancer — not just brain tumors, but cancers throughout the body. Within the first year, the risk of neurological cancer was 76 times higher than in the general population, while non-neurological cancer risk was more than double. Even years later, cancer risk remained modestly elevated. These findings suggest that a first-time seizure may be an early warning sign of occult cancer, and that broader diagnostic workups — beyond standard neurological imaging — should be considered in appropriate clinical contexts.
Detailed Summary
A first-time seizure is often evaluated primarily as a neurological event, but this landmark population-based cohort study from Denmark challenges clinicians to think more broadly. Published in JAMA Neurology, the study examined whether first-time seizures serve as an early clinical signal of undiagnosed cancer — both within the nervous system and elsewhere in the body. The findings are striking: seizures appear to be a sentinel event for occult malignancy at a scale not previously quantified in a nationwide cohort.
The study drew on Danish nationwide medical registries spanning January 1996 through December 2022, identifying 49,894 adults aged 18 or older who received a first-time hospital diagnosis of seizure and had no prior cancer history. The median age at seizure diagnosis was 51.5 years (IQR 35.6–67.8), and 41.4% were women. Outcomes were measured as absolute risks (ARs) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) compared to the general Danish population, stratified across three time windows: within 1 year, 1 to less than 5 years, and 5 to 20 years post-seizure.
Within the first year of follow-up, 1,172 neurological and 850 non-neurological cancers were diagnosed. The 1-year AR for any cancer was 4.1%, with an SIR of 5.30 (95% CI, 5.07–5.54). For neurological cancers specifically, the 1-year AR was 2.4% and the SIR was an extraordinary 76.1 (95% CI, 71.8–80.6), reflecting the well-established link between brain tumors and seizures. For non-neurological cancers, the 1-year AR was 1.7% with an SIR of 2.32 (95% CI, 2.17–2.48) — a more than twofold elevation that is clinically meaningful and less widely appreciated.
The elevated risk persisted beyond the first year, though at lower magnitudes. From 1 to less than 5 years, 87 neurological and 1,226 non-neurological cancers were observed, yielding SIRs of 1.85 (95% CI, 1.48–2.28) and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09–1.22), respectively. From 5 to 20 years, 112 neurological and 2,120 non-neurological cancers were recorded, with SIRs of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.20–1.75) and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.28–1.39). The overall 5-to-20-year AR for any cancer reached 13.4%, with an SIR of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.28–1.40), suggesting a sustained but modest long-term cancer signal.
The clinical implications are significant. The massive short-term SIR for neurological cancers confirms that brain tumors frequently present with seizures, but the doubling of non-neurological cancer risk in the first year is a less-recognized finding that warrants attention. This may reflect paraneoplastic mechanisms, where systemic cancers trigger seizures through immune-mediated or metabolic pathways, or simply that diagnostic workup following a seizure uncovers previously silent malignancies. The authors argue that broader cancer screening — beyond neuroimaging — should be considered in select patients presenting with a first-time seizure, particularly older adults or those with other risk factors.
Key limitations include the registry-based design, which relies on administrative diagnostic codes and may not capture all clinical nuances. The study cannot fully distinguish between seizures that directly caused cancer detection (surveillance bias) and those that are biologically linked to cancer development. Nonetheless, the nationwide scope, long follow-up, and large sample size provide robust epidemiological evidence that first-time seizures are a clinically important signal deserving a more comprehensive diagnostic response than is currently standard practice.
Key Findings
- Within 1 year of first-time seizure, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for neurological cancer was 76.1 (95% CI, 71.8–80.6), representing a 76-fold elevated risk vs. the general population
- The 1-year absolute risk of neurological cancer was 2.4% and for non-neurological cancer was 1.7%, yielding a combined any-cancer absolute risk of 4.1%
- Non-neurological cancer risk was more than doubled within the first year (SIR 2.32; 95% CI, 2.17–2.48), a finding less widely recognized than the brain tumor association
- Elevated cancer risk persisted long-term: SIR for any cancer was 1.18 (1–5 years) and 1.34 (5–20 years) after the seizure
- From 5 to 20 years post-seizure, 2,120 non-neurological cancers were observed with an SIR of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.28–1.39) and an absolute risk of 12.8%
- The overall SIR for any cancer in the first year was 5.30 (95% CI, 5.07–5.54), driven by both neurological and non-neurological malignancies
- The cohort included 49,894 adults (median age 51.5 years; 41.4% women) followed from 1996 to 2022 across Danish nationwide registries
Methodology
This was a population-based cohort study using Danish nationwide medical registries from January 1996 through December 2022, enrolling 49,894 adults aged 18 or older with a first-time hospital seizure diagnosis and no prior cancer history. Outcomes were absolute risks (ARs) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals, calculated relative to the general Danish population across three time windows (0–1 year, 1–5 years, 5–20 years). Competing risks (emigration, death) were accounted for, and non-melanoma skin cancers were excluded from outcome definitions. Statistical analyses were conducted from January through December 2025.
Study Limitations
The registry-based design relies on administrative diagnostic codes, which may introduce misclassification of seizure etiology and cancer type, and cannot fully capture clinical context or seizure characteristics. Surveillance bias is a significant concern — the diagnostic workup triggered by a seizure may simply uncover pre-existing cancers rather than reflecting a true biological link, particularly in the first year. The study also cannot distinguish between paraneoplastic seizures and coincidental cancer diagnoses, limiting causal inference. No conflicts of interest were reported by the authors beyond institutional research funding.
Enjoyed this summary?
Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.
