Heart HealthResearch PaperOpen Access

HFpEF Treatment Revolution: SGLT2i, Finerenone, and GLP-1 Drugs Finally Deliver

A landmark review details how three new drug classes are transforming heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, once a condition with no proven therapy.

Monday, July 6, 2026 1 view
Published in Int J Heart Fail
A cardiologist reviewing an echocardiogram on a large monitor in a dimly lit cardiac imaging suite, with waveforms and left ventricular measurements visible on screen

Summary

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) affects roughly 32 million people worldwide and until recently had no proven disease-modifying treatment. This comprehensive 2026 review from Karolinska Institutet synthesizes the latest evidence showing that SGLT2 inhibitors, the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone, and GLP-1 receptor agonists have fundamentally changed management. The EMPEROR-Preserved trial showed empagliflozin cut hospitalizations by 29%, while DELIVER confirmed similar benefits with dapagliflozin. Finerenone's FINEARTS-HF trial demonstrated reduced cardiovascular death and total HF events. GLP-1 agents including semaglutide and tirzepatide show major quality-of-life benefits in obese HFpEF patients. The review also covers the complex pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, and need for phenotype-specific treatment strategies.

Detailed Summary

HFpEF represents roughly half of all heart failure cases globally — an estimated 32 million people — yet 35–75% of patients who meet diagnostic criteria remain unrecognized in clinical practice. Annual mortality approaches 15%, five-year rehospitalization rates reach 80%, and five-year death rates hit 50%. Until recently, management was limited to diuretics for symptom relief and comorbidity control, with no drug demonstrably altering disease progression. This 2026 narrative review from Karolinska Institutet and the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf synthesizes the mechanistic understanding and pivotal trial evidence now reshaping HFpEF care.

The pathophysiology section moves well beyond the outdated 'stiff ventricle from hypertension' model, framing HFpEF as a multisystem syndrome driven by systemic inflammation, microvascular endothelial dysfunction, impaired calcium handling, RAAS overactivation, and metabolic inflammation ('metaflammation'). Obesity, present in 30–40% of HFpEF patients, is highlighted as a dominant phenotype, generating visceral fat-derived cytokines such as interleukin-6, epicardial fat accumulation, volume expansion, and neurohormonal activation — all converging to elevate left ventricular filling pressures and drive diastolic stiffness.

For SGLT2 inhibitors, the review details EMPEROR-Preserved (n=5,988), in which empagliflozin reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69–0.90), driven primarily by a 29% reduction in HF hospitalizations (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60–0.83). Cardiovascular mortality was not significantly reduced (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76–1.09). The DELIVER trial with dapagliflozin produced strikingly consistent results. A meta-analysis of both trials in patients with EF ≥50% confirmed a 20% reduction in the composite primary endpoint (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.73–0.87), with evidence of reduced all-cause mortality as well.

Finerenone, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, was tested in FINEARTS-HF (n=6,001), enrolling patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. The primary endpoint — total cardiovascular deaths and total HF events — was significantly reduced (rate ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p=0.007), marking the first non-SGLT2i drug to demonstrate outcome benefit in this population. Crucially, finerenone avoided the hyperkalemia and renal adverse effects that limited older steroidal MRAs such as spironolactone, which failed to reach primary endpoints in the TOPCAT trial.

For the obese HFpEF phenotype, GLP-1 receptor agonists semaglutide and the dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist tirzepatide showed compelling results. The STEP-HFpEF trial (semaglutide 2.4 mg) demonstrated an 8.4-point improvement in KCCQ clinical summary score versus 0.7 points for placebo (p<0.001) and a mean 13.3% body weight reduction versus 2.6% for placebo. SUMMIT (tirzepatide, n=731) showed significant reductions in the composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF events (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41–0.95), though definitive mortality outcomes in larger cohorts are still awaited.

The review concludes by emphasizing that HFpEF now demands a phenotype-guided, multi-drug strategy — SGLT2i as foundational therapy across the EF spectrum, finerenone for additional neurohormonal blockade, and GLP-1/GIP agonists specifically for obese phenotypes. Diagnostic challenges including low natriuretic peptides in obese patients and the underperformance of scoring tools like HFA-PEFF relative to H2FPEF remain barriers to timely treatment initiation. Ongoing trials targeting inflammation, fibrosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction may yield further options.

Key Findings

  • EMPEROR-Preserved: empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69–0.90), with HF hospitalization alone down 29% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60–0.83)
  • Meta-analysis of EMPEROR-Preserved + DELIVER in EF ≥50%: composite primary endpoint reduced by 20% (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.73–0.87), with evidence of all-cause mortality reduction
  • FINEARTS-HF (n=6,001): finerenone cut total cardiovascular deaths and HF events by 16% (rate ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p=0.007) — first non-SGLT2i drug to demonstrate outcome benefit in HFpEF/HFmrEF
  • STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide 2.4 mg produced a 13.3% body weight reduction vs 2.6% placebo and an 8.4-point vs 0.7-point KCCQ improvement (p<0.001) in obese HFpEF patients
  • SUMMIT trial: tirzepatide reduced composite cardiovascular death or worsening HF by 38% (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41–0.95) in obese HFpEF patients
  • Up to 35–75% of patients meeting HFpEF diagnostic criteria remain unrecognized, and annual mortality approaches 15% with 5-year death rates reaching 50%
  • H2FPEF diagnostic score demonstrated greater sensitivity, accuracy, and discriminative ability than HFA-PEFF score when validated against invasive hemodynamics as reference standard

Methodology

This is a narrative review article published in the International Journal of Heart Failure (January 2026), synthesizing evidence from major randomized controlled trials including EMPEROR-Preserved, DELIVER, FINEARTS-HF, TOPCAT, STEP-HFpEF, and SUMMIT, as well as prior meta-analyses and mechanistic studies. No original data collection or statistical analysis was performed by the authors. The review covers diagnostic scoring tools (H2FPEF, HFA-PEFF), pathophysiological frameworks, and pharmacological trial outcomes; it does not apply formal systematic review methodology such as PRISMA screening or risk-of-bias assessment.

Study Limitations

As a narrative rather than systematic review, the article is subject to selection bias in the literature chosen and does not provide formal grading of evidence quality. The trials discussed enrolled somewhat heterogeneous populations, and treatment effects in specific subgroups (e.g., non-obese HFpEF or patients with very high EF) remain incompletely defined. The authors acknowledge potential conflicts of interest, as several have received honoraria or research support from pharmaceutical companies marketing the reviewed drugs.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.

Enter your email to subscribe: