12 Years of Exercise Data Shows Physical Activity Slows Biological Aging by Over a Year
A large HRS study links regular moderate-to-vigorous activity with 1.26–1.70 fewer years of epigenetic age acceleration across three DNA methylation clocks.
Summary
Researchers tracked physical activity in nearly 3,900 older Americans over 12 years and measured biological aging via three DNA methylation clocks. Physically active participants showed significantly younger biological ages — up to 1.70 years younger by PhenoAge and 1.26 years younger by GrimAge — compared to inactive peers. A novel life-course modeling approach revealed that both cumulative lifetime exercise habits and current activity levels were the strongest predictors of slower biological aging. Effects persisted after adjusting for BMI, chronic disease, and mobility. The findings suggest that consistent moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is one of the most reliable lifestyle factors for slowing epigenetic aging in older adults.
Detailed Summary
Epigenetic aging clocks — tools that measure biological age through DNA methylation patterns — are among the most promising biomarkers for predicting health outcomes and disease risk in aging populations. While prior research has suggested exercise may slow epigenetic aging, most studies have been cross-sectional or relied on short-term interventions. This study from the University of Michigan addresses that gap using 12 years of longitudinal physical activity data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), one of the largest and most representative cohorts of older Americans.
The study enrolled 3,873 participants from the HRS Venous Blood Study, all of whom had leukocyte DNA methylation assessed in 2016 using the Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip. Three second-generation epigenetic clocks were used: GrimAge acceleration (GrimAA), PhenoAge acceleration (PhenoAA), and DunedinPACE. These clocks were chosen for their superior ability to capture biological aging variability compared to first-generation tools. Physical activity was self-reported biennially from 2004 to 2016, with participants classified as 'active' if they engaged in vigorous activity at least weekly or moderate activity more than once weekly.
In cross-sectional analysis for 2016, 58% of participants were classified as physically active. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, total wealth, and smoking status, active participants had significantly lower epigenetic age acceleration: −1.26 years for GrimAA (95% CI: −1.59 to −0.93), −1.70 years for PhenoAA (95% CI: −2.26 to −1.15), and −0.05 years per chronological year for DunedinPACE (95% CI: −0.06 to −0.04). These associations attenuated only slightly after further adjustment for BMI, mobility limitations, and chronic disease, indicating that the relationship is not simply mediated by body composition or illness burden.
Importantly, the researchers applied a Structured Life-Course Modelling Approach (SLCMA) — a novel statistical method that simultaneously evaluates wave-specific and cumulative physical activity exposures to determine which timing pattern best predicts EAA. This approach identified both accumulated physical activity over the full follow-up period and the most recent 2016 measurement as the two strongest predictors of epigenetic age acceleration across all three clocks. This dual finding suggests that both long-term consistency and current activity independently matter for biological aging.
The study also uncovered meaningful effect modification by social factors. Males showed significantly stronger associations between physical activity and DunedinPACE compared to females (P-interaction = 0.04). Notably, Hispanic participants showed a paradoxical positive association between physical activity and GrimAA compared to non-Hispanic Whites (P-interaction = 0.009), a finding the authors suggest warrants further investigation and may reflect unmeasured socioeconomic or cultural factors. These heterogeneities underscore that the benefits of physical activity on epigenetic aging may not be uniformly distributed across demographic groups, with implications for targeted public health interventions.
Key Findings
- Physically active participants had 1.26 fewer years of GrimAge acceleration (95% CI: −1.59 to −0.93) compared to inactive peers
- PhenoAge acceleration was 1.70 years lower in active vs. inactive participants (95% CI: −2.26 to −1.15)
- DunedinPACE was 0.05 units lower per chronological year in active participants (95% CI: −0.06 to −0.04)
- SLCMA identified both cumulative physical activity (2004–2016) and concurrent 2016 activity as the two strongest independent predictors of lower EAA across all three clocks
- 58% of the 3,873 participants were classified as physically active in 2016
- Males showed stronger physical activity–DunedinPACE associations than females (P-interaction = 0.04)
- Hispanic participants paradoxically showed higher GrimAge acceleration with physical activity vs. non-Hispanic Whites (P-interaction = 0.009)
Methodology
This study used data from 3,873 participants in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of US adults aged 56+, followed biennially from 2004 to 2016. Leukocyte DNA methylation was measured via Infinium EPIC BeadChip in 2016, and three second-generation epigenetic clocks (GrimAge, PhenoAge, DunedinPACE) were used to calculate epigenetic age acceleration. Cross-sectional weighted linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, wealth, smoking, BMI, mobility, and chronic disease. A Structured Life-Course Modelling Approach (SLCMA) using Least Angle Regression (LARS) and selective inference was employed to identify which timing of physical activity — wave-specific or cumulative — best predicted EAA.
Study Limitations
Physical activity was self-reported and lacked information on exercise duration, preventing full adherence-to-guidelines assessment. DNA methylation was measured only at a single time point (2016), limiting the ability to draw causal conclusions about directionality. The paradoxical finding in Hispanic participants may reflect residual confounding from unmeasured socioeconomic or cultural variables, and the authors note this warrants replication in dedicated studies. No conflicts of interest were reported; the study was funded by the National Institute on Aging.
Enjoyed this summary?
Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.
