Fasting Depletes a Key Metabolite That Triggers Mitochondrial Cleanup
Scientists identify cytosolic acetyl-CoA as a direct signal for mitophagy, acting through receptor NLRX1 — independent of AMPK and mTOR.
Summary
Researchers at Fudan University discovered that cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A (AcCoA) acts as a direct metabolic signal to control mitophagy — the cellular process of clearing damaged mitochondria. When AcCoA levels drop in the cytosol (as during fasting or when key enzymes like ACLY or SLC25A1 are inhibited), a mitochondrial outer membrane protein called NLRX1 detects the change and triggers mitochondrial removal. This mechanism operates independently of the two classic autophagy regulators AMPK and mTOR. Importantly, supplementing with acetate — which replenishes cytosolic AcCoA — blocked the mitophagy response. The same pathway was found to drive resistance to KRAS-targeted cancer drugs, making it a potentially actionable target for both longevity medicine and oncology.
Detailed Summary
Mitophagy — the selective autophagic clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria — is fundamental to cellular quality control and longevity. While the PINK1–Parkin pathway is well characterized, less is known about how nutritional status, particularly fasting, activates mitophagy through receptor-mediated pathways. This Nature paper by Zhang, Shen, Shen, Wang et al. identifies cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A (AcCoA) as a direct metabolic signal linking nutrient availability to mitophagy, mediated by the mitochondrial outer membrane protein NLRX1.
The researchers began by modeling fasting conditions in vitro using a mild starvation medium (SM: 5 mM glucose, 2 mM glutamine), mirroring serum metabolite changes observed in overnight-fasted mice. SM induced measurable mitophagy — demonstrated by elevated acidic mt-Keima reporter signals, decreased mtDNA/nDNA ratios, and reduced mitochondrial proteins TIM23, MT-CO2, and HSP60 — in HeLa, A549, and MCF7 cells, but not in U-2 OS cells. This mitophagy was blocked by bafilomycin A1, confirming autophagic flux. Crucially, SM did not activate AMPK (no increase in p-AMPK or p-ULK1-S555) and did not suppress mTORC1, distinguishing this pathway from canonical starvation-induced autophagy.
Mass spectrometry revealed that cytosolic — but not mitochondrial — AcCoA levels specifically decreased in SM-responsive cells (HeLa, A549, MCF7), not in the non-responsive U-2 OS cells. These responsive cells also had significantly higher baseline expression of ACLY, FASN, IDH1, SLC25A1, and ACC1 — all enzymes involved in cytosolic AcCoA metabolism. Pharmacological inhibition of ACLY (using HC or SB204990) or SLC25A1 (using BTC) reduced cytosolic AcCoA and enhanced mitophagy. Genetic knockdown of ACLY, SLC25A1, or ACSS2 replicated these effects in normal medium. Acetate supplementation — which replenishes cytosolic AcCoA via ACSS2 — abolished SM-induced and ACLY-knockdown-induced mitophagy, confirming the causal role of cytosolic AcCoA.
To identify the molecular mediator, the team performed a genome-wide CRISPR screen for genes required for HC-induced mitophagy. NLRX1 emerged as the top-ranked mitophagy receptor gene. Knockout of NLRX1 abolished mitophagy induced by SM, ACLY inhibition, or SLC25A1 inhibition both in cell culture and in vivo. In Nlrx1−/− mice, intraperitoneal HC injection failed to reduce mitochondrial mass in liver tissue, and mt-Keima signals confirmed absent mitophagy response compared with wild-type controls.
Mechanistically, structural and biochemical analyses showed that cytosolic AcCoA binds directly to a conserved pocket within NLRX1's leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain. This binding stabilizes an intramolecular interaction between the LRR and NACHT domains, maintaining NLRX1 in an autoinhibited conformation that prevents its association with the autophagy adaptor LC3. When AcCoA levels fall, this autoinhibition is relieved, NLRX1 binds LC3, and mitophagy proceeds. Finally, the study found that KRAS inhibitor treatment (which suppresses glycolysis and reduces cytosolic AcCoA) activates NLRX1-dependent mitophagy, and that this response promotes cancer cell survival and drug resistance — nominating the AcCoA–NLRX1 axis as a therapeutic target to overcome KRAS inhibitor resistance in cancer.
Key Findings
- Short-term fasting and pharmacological/genetic inhibition of cytosolic AcCoA-generating enzymes (ACLY, SLC25A1, ACSS2) trigger mitophagy, which is reversed by acetate supplementation
- ACLY inhibition and SLC25A1 inhibition each induced mitophagy in mt-Keima reporter assays in HeLa, A549, and MCF7 cells, while acetate supplementation reversed the effect
- SM-induced mitophagy occurred without AMPK activation (no increase in p-AMPK or p-ULK1-S555) and without mTORC1 suppression, establishing a nutrient-sensing pathway distinct from canonical starvation autophagy
- A genome-wide CRISPR screen identified NLRX1 as the top mitophagy receptor required for cytosolic AcCoA-reduction-induced mitophagy; NLRX1 knockout abolished the response in vitro and in vivo
- In Nlrx1−/− mice, ACLY inhibitor injection failed to induce hepatic mitophagy, confirming NLRX1 dependence in vivo
- AcCoA binds directly to a conserved pocket on NLRX1's LRR domain, stabilizing an LRR–NACHT autoinhibitory interaction that blocks LC3 binding; AcCoA depletion relieves this autoinhibition to enable mitophagy
- KRAS inhibitor treatment activates NLRX1-dependent mitophagy via cytosolic AcCoA reduction, and this response promotes cancer cell survival, implicating the AcCoA–NLRX1 axis in KRAS inhibitor resistance
Methodology
The study combined in vitro experiments across multiple cell lines (HeLa, A549, MCF7, U-2 OS) with in vivo mouse models including Nlrx1−/− knockouts, using mt-Keima flow cytometry and confocal imaging, mass spectrometry-based AcCoA quantification, genome-wide CRISPR screening (analyzed via MAGeCK software), and structural/biochemical binding assays. In vivo experiments used 3–4 mice per group with intraperitoneal delivery of HC (100 mg/kg) or sodium acetate. Statistical analyses employed one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's test and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction across biological triplicates.
Study Limitations
The paper relies primarily on cell lines and short-term mouse experiments; long-term in vivo consequences of modulating the AcCoA–NLRX1 axis on healthspan, aging, or disease outcomes remain uncharacterized. The mechanistic work is largely biochemical and structural, and further physiological validation of NLRX1 conformational dynamics in vivo would strengthen translational claims. Clinical translation to humans — including whether ACLY inhibitors or dietary acetate can safely modulate this axis in patients — has not been tested.
Enjoyed this summary?
Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.
