Longevity & AgingPress Release

New Liver Perfusion Technique Cuts Transplant Complications by Nearly Half

A randomized trial found hypothermic oxygenated perfusion slashed early graft failure rates from 37% to 20% in liver transplant patients.

Thursday, May 28, 2026 0 views
Published in MedPage Today
Article visualization: New Liver Perfusion Technique Cuts Transplant Complications by Nearly Half

Summary

A new organ preservation method called hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) significantly improved outcomes for liver transplant patients receiving high-risk donor organs. In a randomized trial of 219 patients across 15 U.S. centers, HOPE reduced early allograft dysfunction — a key marker of transplant failure — from 37.3% down to 20.2% compared to standard cold storage alone. Patients in the HOPE group also left the hospital faster, with a median stay of 8 days versus 10.7 days. The technique involves chilling and oxygenating the donor liver at the recipient hospital before implantation. One-year survival rates were similar between groups, but the early functional improvements were strong enough to end the trial early at interim analysis.

Detailed Summary

Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure, but donor organ quality remains a critical limiting factor. Extended-criteria donor livers — those from older or higher-risk donors — carry elevated risks of early failure after transplant. A new preservation strategy may change that equation significantly.

The Bridge to HOPE trial, published in JAMA Surgery, enrolled 219 patients across 15 U.S. liver transplant centers. Participants received extended-criteria donor livers and were randomized to either standard static cold storage (SCS) alone or SCS followed by back-to-base hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE). In the HOPE method, the liver is transported to the recipient hospital on ice, then actively chilled and oxygenated before being implanted.

The results were striking. Early allograft dysfunction — a measure of how well the liver functions in the first week post-transplant — occurred in just 20.2% of HOPE patients compared to 37.3% in the control group. Mean early allograft function scores were also significantly better in the HOPE group. Hospital stays were shorter too: 8 days versus 10.7 days on average. These improvements were significant enough that the trial was stopped early at interim analysis.

One-year graft and patient survival rates were similar between groups (95.4% vs 92.7% and 97.2% vs 96.4%, respectively), suggesting HOPE's primary benefit lies in reducing early complications rather than dramatically altering long-term survival — at least within the first year.

Commentators noted that other perfusion methods, including normothermic machine perfusion, are also widely used in the U.S., and head-to-head comparisons are still needed. The trial was open-label, and the patient population was predominantly male and white, which may limit generalizability. Still, HOPE's logistical simplicity and clear short-term benefits position it as a meaningful advance in transplant medicine.

Key Findings

  • HOPE reduced early liver graft dysfunction from 37.3% to 20.2% in high-risk donor transplants
  • Median hospital stay dropped from 10.7 to 8 days with HOPE versus standard cold storage
  • Results were strong enough to trigger early trial termination at interim analysis
  • One-year graft and patient survival rates remained similar between both groups
  • Back-to-base HOPE is logistically simpler than some rival perfusion technologies

Methodology

This is a news report summarizing a peer-reviewed randomized controlled trial published in JAMA Surgery, a high-credibility surgical journal. The Bridge to HOPE trial included 219 participants at 15 U.S. centers with 97% completing 12-month follow-up. The trial was open-label, which introduces potential bias in assessment of outcomes.

Study Limitations

The trial was open-label, which may introduce performance or assessment bias. The population was predominantly male and white, limiting generalizability. One-year survival differences were not statistically significant, so long-term benefit beyond early graft function remains to be established.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.